[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
Serial 27
Northern Territory
Aboriginal Sacred Sites Amendment Bill 2005
Mr
McAdam
AN ACT
to amend
the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY ABORIGINAL SACRED SITES AMENDMENT ACT 2005
____________________
Act No. [ ] of 2005
____________________
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Section
NORTHERN TERRITORY OF
AUSTRALIA
____________________
Act No. [ ] of 2005
____________________
AN ACT
[Assented to [ ] 2005]
[Second reading [ ] 2005]
The Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory enacts as follows:
This Act may be cited as the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Amendment Act 2005.
This Act comes into operation on the date fixed by the Administrator by notice in the Gazette.
This Act amends the Northern Territory Aboriginal Sacred Sites Act.
Section 4 –
repeal, substitute
(1) This Act binds the Crown in right of the Territory and, to the extent the legislative power of the Legislative Assembly permits, the Crown in all its other capacities.
(2) If the Crown in any of its capacities commits an offence against this Act, the Crown is liable in that capacity to be prosecuted for the offence as if it were a body corporate.
(3) This section does not affect any liability of an officer, employee or agent of the Crown to be prosecuted for an offence.
(4) In this section –
"Crown" includes –
(a) an Agency; and
(b) an authority or instrumentality of the Crown.
(1) Section 38 –
omit
A person
substitute
(1) A person
(2) Section 38, at the end –
insert
(2) In subsection (1) –
"person" includes a court or tribunal.
After section 39 in Part IV –
insert
39A. Time for commencing prosecution
(1) A prosecution under this Act must be commenced –
(a) within 2 years after the day on which the Authority becomes aware of the commission of the alleged offence; or
(b) within any further time the court allows.
(2) The court may allow further time if it considers the delay was justified in all the circumstances, including the following:
(a) the remoteness of the location where the offence is alleged to have occurred;
(b) the infrequency or irregularity of visits to that location;
(c) any inability to visit that location because of Aboriginal tradition;
(d) any difficulties in identifying or locating the alleged offender and any witnesses to the alleged offence.
____________________________
__________________
[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]