[Index] [Search] [Download] [Help]
This is a Bill, not an Act. For current law, see the Acts databases.
House of Assembly—No 122
As laid on the table and read a first time, 4 July 2005
South Australia
Special
Commission of Inquiry (Powers and Immunities) Bill 2005
A Bill For
An Act to facilitate a special commission of inquiry by
conferring evidentiary powers and immunities.
Contents
1 Short title
2 Commencement
3 Interpretation
4 Application of certain provisions of
Ombudsman Act 1972 to Inquiry
5 Power to require attendance of
witnesses etc
6 Obligation to give evidence
7 Privileges and
immunities
The Parliament of South Australia enacts
as follows:
This Act may be cited as the Special Commission of Inquiry
(Powers and Immunities) Act 2005.
This Act will come into operation on a day to be fixed by
proclamation.
In this Act, unless the contrary intention
appears—
authorised person means the Special Commissioner or a
person who is appointed by the Premier to assist the Special Commissioner in
the conduct of the Inquiry;
evidentiary material means any document, object or substance
of evidentiary value or possible evidentiary value to the Inquiry;
Inquiry means an Inquiry that is established by the Government with terms
of reference and conditions of inquiry the same as those proposed by the House
of Assembly in a resolution of that House passed on 4 July 2005;
Special Commissioner means a person who is appointed by the Governor to conduct
the Inquiry.
4—Application of certain provisions of Ombudsman Act 1972 to Inquiry
(1) The relevant provisions of the Ombudsman
Act 1972 apply to and in relation to the Inquiry, as if—
(a) the Inquiry were the investigation of an administrative act
by the Ombudsman under that Act; and
(b) the Special Commissioner were the Ombudsman.
(2) The relevant provisions are—
(a) section 18(2), (3) and (6); and
(b) section 23; and
(c) section 24.
5—Power to require attendance of witnesses etc
(1) An
authorised person may issue a summons requiring a person to appear before the
Inquiry at a specified time and place to give evidence or to produce
evidentiary material (or both).
(2) A
summons to produce evidentiary material may, instead of providing for
production of evidentiary material before the Inquiry, provide for production
of the evidentiary material to an authorised person nominated in the summons.
(3) An
authorised person may administer an oath or affirmation to a person appearing
before the Inquiry.
(1) If a person refuses or fails—
(a) to comply with a summons issued under this Act; or
(b) to make an oath or affirmation when required to do so by an
authorised person; or
(c) to answer a question on a subject relevant to the Inquiry to
the best of the person's knowledge, information and belief,
the Supreme Court may, on application by an authorised person,
compel the attendance of the person before the Court to give evidence or to
produce evidentiary material for the purposes of the Inquiry.
(2) A person who, without reasonable excuse,
refuses or fails—
(a) to comply with a summons issued under this Act; or
(b) to make an oath or affirmation when required to do so by an
authorised person; or
(c) to answer a question on a subject relevant to the Inquiry to
the best of the person's knowledge, information and belief,
is guilty of an offence and liable to a penalty not exceeding
$10 000.
(1) An
authorised person has, in connection with the conduct of the Inquiry, and in
respect of any report prepared as part of, or at the conclusion of, the
Inquiry, the same protection, privileges and immunities as a Judge of the
Supreme Court.
(2) A
person who appears before the Inquiry, or who provides evidentiary material to
the Inquiry, has the same protection, privileges and immunities as a witness in
proceedings before the Supreme Court.
(3) A legal practitioner who represents a person in connection with the Inquiry has the same protection, privileges, immunities and obligations as counsel involved in proceedings before the Supreme Court.